In sitcoms there seem to be three categories. 

There's the good stuff. Cheers. Everybody Loves Raymond. Frasier. 

Then there's the bad stuff. 8 Simple Rules. Samantha Who? Wanda at Large.

Then there's a whole new category of bad... Everything inspired by "Friends." 100 Questions. Best Friends Forever. Happy Endings. The list goes on.

Want to make sure your pilot is better than the competition? Discover the important differences between good and bad pilots below...

KEEP READING FOR MORE...

What's So Bad About "Friends"?

Nothing. "Friends" was a hit. It worked. 

Six good looking twenty somethings living in a way too nice apartment in a non-descript New York. 

People loved it. That's obvious.

The problem is, writers have failed to realize that the template for "Friends" could only work once. And when they do use the template, they take the 'eh' and leave the brilliance behind.

You see it every pilot season, and the results just keep getting worse.

There are clear reasons why these "Friends" knock-offs fail. In fact, there are quite a few things that almost every bad sitcom has in common.

The good shows have a lot in common too.

I know, because over the last few weeks Chelsea and I have watched hundreds of pilots. We studied them, took notes on them, and compared the great with the "Happily Divorced."

This post is a result of all those hours spent in front of our TV, 22 minutes at a time.

It's the definitive good vs. bad list on how to write the original sitcom that will get you work...

Here's the List:

Good pilots open with an information gap.
Bad pilots open with an information dump.

Good pilots use setting to define character.
Bad pilots could take place anywhere, with anyone.

Good pilots live in the present.
Bad pilots dwell in the past.

Good pilots start with a memorable image.
Bad pilots start in an apartment in any major American city.

Good pilots use at least one character just for comic relief.
Bad pilots don't embrace the dumb guy.

Good pilots optimize location.
Bad pilots don't even define location.

Good pilots have rhythm.
Bad pilots stop and start and stutter.


Good pilots have inherent conflict.
Bad pilots rely on outside sources for conflict.

Good pilots let actions speak for themselves.
Bad pilots talk about what's happening on screen.

Good pilots have tons of potential for romantic twists and turns.
Bad pilots don't address potential romance.


Good pilots use fresh, new story telling devices.
Bad pilots repeat what's been done before. 

Good pilots use cause and effect.
Bad pilots are a series of loosely related scenes.

Good pilots are built for longevity.
Bad pilots don't look far enough in the future.

Good pilots start with a joke.
Bad pilots put story ahead of comedy.

Good pilots emphasize routine.
Bad pilots are people sitting and talking.

Good pilots are about characters.
Bad pilots are about gimmicks.


Good pilots have characters that make assumptions.
Bad pilots have characters that state facts.

What Do You Have to Add?

Comment below with any more important differences between good pilots and bad pilots.  There are tons out there. 

Or tell us we're wrong and 100 Questions is actually amazing. Either way - - comment now.


If you haven't signed up to our email list, sign up now. You'll get weekly updates, exclusive content and all the information you need to break out in the screenwriting world.

 


Comments

Cryssi
09/12/2012 10:26am

Helpful! And in thinking about all the pilots I have tried out on Netflix I think I'm now qualified to say that you pinpointed accurately all the things that separate the good from the blah.

Reply
09/12/2012 5:20pm

Thanks, Cryssi. Glad the article helped you see those pilots in a new light. Netflix has a lot of duds. I think we'll be adding to this list whenever a new comparison pops up, so check back!

Reply
Lindsay
09/12/2012 11:49am

I almost stopped reading when you said Happy Endings was a bad sitcom. It does several of the things you say are good: revels in the city of Chicago as a landscape, plays with potential pairings, and has memorable characters that embrace their oddities. It may have a Friends-type building block in their somewhere, but it stands on its own.
This is a great list, though.

Reply
09/12/2012 2:22pm

I'm glad you didn't stop reading! You're right, Happy Endings is a stretch. I included it there because I think the pilot has a lot of the problems listed in the article. A better example would be something like "Unhitched," the Farrelly brothers sitcom that tanked a while back.

Might go ahead and make the switch later today. Thanks for calling me out on it!

Reply
Robert J. Locke
09/12/2012 12:50pm

Thank you!! Very nice job!!

Reply
09/12/2012 5:21pm

You're welcome, Robert. Looking forward to seeing you around the blog.

Reply
Steve
09/12/2012 7:41pm

Interesting, valuable and very timely! Thank you!

Reply
Brett Snelgrove link
09/13/2012 4:48am

Nice post and some good simple rules of thumb not just for sitcoms but any script. Sitcoms look deceptively effortless but I think they can be one of the hardest TV formats to crack.

Reply
Mercutio
09/26/2012 2:23am

i think part of the problem is that all of the sitcoms try to be hits, and gets sort of bland because of it. i believe having a clear theme is important in today's sitcoms. friends was about friendship. the big bang theory has a nerd theme to add to this. it's basically friends with nerds. as long as the sitcom has a friend like setting, adding another thing that unites and identifies the group seems to be a very common practice. finding this thing is the difficult part. nerds are interesting at the moment, ordinary people aren't. how about a sitcom based in a psychriatic ward? i guarantee success.

Reply
10/11/2012 3:58pm

It's definitely hard to find the balance between defining a good world and establishing a 'hook' for your sitcom. Most great sitcoms have a very simple premise, and you're right, those that search for a big hook seem to have a tendency to flop.

With sitcoms, Strong Theme > Great Premise. A combination of both has real potential!

Thanks for commenting, Mercutio!

Reply



Leave a Reply